Thursday, October 15, 2026
No Result
View All Result
JURDI - Juristes pour le respect du droit international
Support us
JOIN US
  • Home
  • Who are we ?
    • Executive board
    • The scientific council
    • Our different divisions
  • Our actions
    • All
    • International disputes
    • Internal disputes
    Question-réponses sur l’assignation du gouvernement français devant le Conseil d’état pour son inaction face aux activités économiques dans le Territoire palestinien occupé

    Questions and answers regarding the summons of the French government before the Council of State for its inaction in the face of economic activities in the occupied Palestinian territory

    Question-réponses sur l’assignation du gouvernement français devant le Conseil d’état pour son inaction face aux activités économiques dans le Territoire palestinien occupé

    France is being sued before the Council of State for corporate support of the Israeli occupation.

    La colonisation israélienne du Territoire palestinien occupé:  JURDI saisit le Bureau du Procureur de la Cour Pénale Internationale

    Israeli colonization of the occupied Palestinian territory: JURDI refers the matter to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court

    Propos faussement attribués à Francesca Albanese : JURDI saisit la Cour de Justice de la République des déclarations du ministre Jean-Noël Barrot –  Communiqué de presse de JURDI, 4 mars 2026.

    Statements falsely attributed to Francesca Albanese: JURDI brings the statements of Minister Jean-Noël Barrot before the Court of Justice of the Republic – JURDI press release, March 4, 2026.

  • Our publications
    • All
    • Advocacy
    • Scientific research
    Communiqué collectif: Appel urgent à l’action : les États doivent agir maintenant pour protéger la Cour Pénale Internationale des attaques illégales des États-Unis

    Joint statement: Urgent call to action: States must act now to protect the International Criminal Court from unlawful attacks by the United States

    JURDI salue l’attribution du prix Nobel de la paix 2026 à la juriste sud-africaine Navanethem « Navi » Pillay

    JURDI welcomes the awarding of the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize to South African jurist Navanethem «Navi» Pillay

    Analyse juridique de la conduite d’Israël à Gaza conformément à la Convention pour la Prévention et la Répression du crime de génocide.

    Note on the concept of glorifying terrorism as applied to statements made about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    L’association Juristes pour le Respect du Droit International (JURDI) alerte sur de nouveaux survols de l’espace aérien français par l’avion de B. Netanyahou et adresse un signalement à la Cour pénale internationale.

    The association Jurists for Respect for International Law (JURDI) is raising the alarm about new overflights of French airspace by B. Netanyahu's plane and is sending a report to the International Criminal Court.

  • Agenda & Events
  • Resources
    • All
    • Official UN documents
    • European case law
    • International case law
    • NGO report

    The essence of childhood has been destroyed»: Israels deliberate targeting of Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory since October 7, 2023

    Un autre génocide derrière les murs

    Another genocide behind walls

    Criminalizing accountability: the US lawfare against the international justice system

    Criminalizing accountability: the US lawfare against the international justice system

    Torture and genocide

    Torture and genocide

  • Contact us
  • Home
  • Who are we ?
    • Executive board
    • The scientific council
    • Our different divisions
  • Our actions
    • All
    • International disputes
    • Internal disputes
    Question-réponses sur l’assignation du gouvernement français devant le Conseil d’état pour son inaction face aux activités économiques dans le Territoire palestinien occupé

    Questions and answers regarding the summons of the French government before the Council of State for its inaction in the face of economic activities in the occupied Palestinian territory

    Question-réponses sur l’assignation du gouvernement français devant le Conseil d’état pour son inaction face aux activités économiques dans le Territoire palestinien occupé

    France is being sued before the Council of State for corporate support of the Israeli occupation.

    La colonisation israélienne du Territoire palestinien occupé:  JURDI saisit le Bureau du Procureur de la Cour Pénale Internationale

    Israeli colonization of the occupied Palestinian territory: JURDI refers the matter to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court

    Propos faussement attribués à Francesca Albanese : JURDI saisit la Cour de Justice de la République des déclarations du ministre Jean-Noël Barrot –  Communiqué de presse de JURDI, 4 mars 2026.

    Statements falsely attributed to Francesca Albanese: JURDI brings the statements of Minister Jean-Noël Barrot before the Court of Justice of the Republic – JURDI press release, March 4, 2026.

  • Our publications
    • All
    • Advocacy
    • Scientific research
    Communiqué collectif: Appel urgent à l’action : les États doivent agir maintenant pour protéger la Cour Pénale Internationale des attaques illégales des États-Unis

    Joint statement: Urgent call to action: States must act now to protect the International Criminal Court from unlawful attacks by the United States

    JURDI salue l’attribution du prix Nobel de la paix 2026 à la juriste sud-africaine Navanethem « Navi » Pillay

    JURDI welcomes the awarding of the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize to South African jurist Navanethem «Navi» Pillay

    Analyse juridique de la conduite d’Israël à Gaza conformément à la Convention pour la Prévention et la Répression du crime de génocide.

    Note on the concept of glorifying terrorism as applied to statements made about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    L’association Juristes pour le Respect du Droit International (JURDI) alerte sur de nouveaux survols de l’espace aérien français par l’avion de B. Netanyahou et adresse un signalement à la Cour pénale internationale.

    The association Jurists for Respect for International Law (JURDI) is raising the alarm about new overflights of French airspace by B. Netanyahu's plane and is sending a report to the International Criminal Court.

  • Agenda & Events
  • Resources
    • All
    • Official UN documents
    • European case law
    • International case law
    • NGO report

    The essence of childhood has been destroyed»: Israels deliberate targeting of Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory since October 7, 2023

    Un autre génocide derrière les murs

    Another genocide behind walls

    Criminalizing accountability: the US lawfare against the international justice system

    Criminalizing accountability: the US lawfare against the international justice system

    Torture and genocide

    Torture and genocide

  • Contact us
Support us
JOIN US
JURDI - Juristes pour le respect du droit international
Don

JURDI files a report with the Public Prosecutor for disseminating false information, alleging an attack on the independence of a UN mandate held by Francesca Albanese and a breach of France's international obligations.

February 12, 2026
dans Internal disputes, Judicial jurisdictions
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

PRESS RELEASE – February 12, 2026, Paris

The Association of Jurists for the Respect of International Law (JURDI) expresses its deep concern regarding the public statements made by the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs, Mr. Jean-Noël Barrot, calling for the resignation of Ms. Francesca Albanese, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967. These statements, which constitute a serious breach of the principle of the independence of UN mechanisms and raise the issue of the dissemination of manifestly inaccurate information by public authorities, have led JURDI to file a report today with the Public Prosecutor of Paris concerning actions that may constitute the offense stipulated by law regarding the dissemination of false news, in light of the statements fraudulently attributed to Ms. Francesca Albanese.

On February 11, 2026, in response to a question from Ms. Caroline Yadan, Member of Parliament for French citizens living abroad — who had, a few days earlier on the social network X, distorted the remarks of the Special Rapporteur and publicly likened them to "anti-Semitic" remarks — the Minister declared before the National Assembly:

«France condemns without reservation the outrageous and reprehensible remarks of Ms. Francesca Albanese, which target not the Israeli government (…) but Israel as a people and as a nation, which is absolutely unacceptable (…) She is a political activist who stirs up hate speech (…) Under no circumstances and in no way can Ms. Albanese speak on their behalf, and she betrays their spirit.»

He also announced that France would request his resignation at the Human Rights Council session on February 23, 2026.

However, during her intervention on December 7, 2025 at the public forum organized on the situation in Palestine, as in her other interventions, Ms. Albanese spoke exclusively within the framework of her UN mandate, with reference to her reports entitled «"From an economy of occupation to an economy of genocide"» And «"The genocide in Gaza: a collective crime"». She stated, in particular:

«This is not the first genocide in human history (…) but it is the first to awaken a global conscience (…) Palestine allows us to see what connects all injustices — what is happening in Yemen, Sudan, Congo — including in places where poverty has not been so entrenched for a long time, including in the West. We have a common enemy and we must confront it: a system in which politics serves economic interests.»

More recently, at the 17th Al Jazeera Forum held in Doha, February 7–9, 2026, dedicated to the geopolitical balances surrounding the situation in Palestine, Ms. Albanese stated:

«We have spent the last two years examining the planning and execution of genocide. And the genocide is not over (…) Genocide, as the intentional destruction of a group as such, is now clearly exposed.»

[…]

«The fact that instead of stopping Israel, most of the world armed it, provided it with political excuses, political support, and economic and financial backing, constitutes a challenge (…) If international law has been stabbed in the heart, we now understand that as humanity, we have a common enemy.»

[…]

«We must stand up. We must do what is right (…) We must act. And the time has come (…) for a full commitment to responsibility and justice.»

These statements, which are publicly available in their entirety and easily verifiable, stem from a legal and structural analysis of serious violations of international law, directly related to the functions of the Special Rapporteur entrusted to Ms. Albanese by the United Nations Human Rights Council. They are not directed at a people or a nation, but at political, economic, and legal systems, in accordance with the standards of international law.

However, partial excerpts of this intervention were disseminated on social media on February 8, 2026, by the organization UN Watch, headed by Mr. Hillel Neuer, in a truncated form that failed to provide the context or the full text of the remarks made. This partial version was subsequently shared by several public figures, including Ms. Caroline Yadan, contributing to a distorted interpretation of the Special Rapporteur's statements. It is in this context that the parliamentary question of February 11, 2026, was raised, and that the Minister publicly repeated a manifestly inaccurate presentation of Ms. Albanese's remarks.

By publicly presenting these remarks as hate speech or as targeting «Israel as a people and as a nation,» the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs has clearly distorted their content. Such a presentation, emanating from a public authority and disseminated within an institutional framework, is likely to constitute the spread of fake news, insofar as it attributes to a UN expert statements that she neither made nor endorsed.

Under international law, mandate holders under the Special Procedures exercise their functions with complete independence. In accordance with Article 105 of the Charter of the United Nations and the Convention of 13 February 1946 on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, they are protected for statements made in the performance of their duties. A public demand by a Member State for the resignation of a Special Rapporteur therefore constitutes political pressure incompatible with this requirement of independence.

This move comes amid unprecedented attacks on international mechanisms tasked with documenting violations committed in Palestine, including the particularly severe sanctions imposed by the United States against Ms. Albanese and members of the International Criminal Court, including a French judge, simply because of the exercise of their functions.

This is all the more worrying given that France, bound by positive obligations regarding the prevention and prosecution of international crimes, has to date adopted no concrete measures aimed at preventing these crimes, stopping their commission, or fully cooperating with the execution of arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court. The renewed authorization for the Israeli Prime Minister's plane, despite being the subject of an arrest warrant, to fly over French territory on the very day of the Foreign Minister's intervention, illustrates this deficiency.

JURDI considers that by requesting the resignation of a UN expert for the exercise of functions protected by international law, by disseminating a manifestly inaccurate presentation of her remarks and by simultaneously failing to respect its own international obligations in matters of prevention, repression of genocide and judicial cooperation, France seriously compromises the coherence, credibility and authority of its commitment to international law and multilateralism.

Furthermore, by publicly attributing to the Special Rapporteur statements that she did not make, including equating them with hate speech and anti-Semitism, France is contributing to exposing Ms. Albanese to increased risks of attacks, threats and pressure, thereby endangering the person of an independent expert, which is incompatible with the obligations of United Nations Member States to guarantee the safety and integrity of persons carrying out international functions.

View the full document
Article précédent

Report of a false news dissemination offense – Statements fraudulently attributed to Ms. Francesca Albanese

Article suivant

Distorted statements about Israel: Francesca Albanese sets the record straight

ALL OUR PUBLICATIONS

ADVOCACY

Press Releases and Position Statements Open Letters and Institutional Appeals Tribunes

RESEARCH

Legal Notes and Thematic Fact Sheets Member articles

LITIGATION

Internal disputes International disputes
Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

JURDI – Lawyers for the respect of international law

JURDI - Juristes pour le respect du droit international

OUR PAGES

  • Home
  • Who are we ?
  • Executive board
  • The scientific council
  • Our different divisions
  • Our publications
  • Our actions
  • Resources
  • Agenda & Events
  • Support us
  • Contact us

OUR publications

Member articles Press releases and position statements International disputes Internal disputes Official UN documents Administrative courts Judicial jurisdictions European case law International case law Open letters and institutional appeals Legal notes and fact sheets Advocacy NGO report Scientific research Resources Tribunes

JURDI - Lawyers for the Respect of International Law © 2026 copyright - Legal notice

Welcome Back!

OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Manage consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies such as cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique identifiers on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may negatively affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
Technical access or storage is strictly necessary for the legitimate interest purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
Technical access or storage is necessary for the legitimate interest purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or internet user.
Statistics
Storage or technical access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The storage or technical access is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. In the absence of a subpoena, voluntary compliance from your internet service provider, or additional records from a third party, the information stored or retrieved for this sole purpose generally cannot be used to identify you.
Marketing
Technical access or storage is necessary to create user profiles in order to send advertisements, or to track the user on one or more websites with similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Who are we ?
    • Executive board
    • The scientific council
    • Our different divisions
  • Our actions
    • Internal disputes
      • Judicial jurisdictions
      • Administrative courts
    • International disputes
  • Our publications
    • Advocacy
      • Press releases and position statements
      • Open letters and institutional appeals
      • Tribunes
    • Scientific research
      • Legal notes and fact sheets
      • Member articles
  • Agenda & Events
  • Glossaries & Resources
  • Support us
  • Join us
  • Contact us

JURDI - Lawyers for the Respect of International Law © 2026 copyright - Legal notice

English
French